Effectiveness of an adjustable trolley for specimen handling in a blood screening unit
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62992/tb8b9g25Keywords:
Adjustable trolley, Blood screening unit, Specimen handling taskAbstract
Background: Employees involved in sample collection for testing often perform physically demanding tasks such as bending, lifting, twisting, and standing for long periods. These repetitive activities can increase the risk of musculoskeletal disorders.
Objectives: This study aimed to assess the ergonomic risks associated with sample collection in a blood screening laboratory.
Methods: This quasi-experimental study involved eight volunteers who worked from August 21, 2023, to June 13, 2024, in a blood screening unit in the Nakhon Sawan province. Data were collected using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire, Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA), and flow process chart. Further analysis was conducted using the Wilcoxon signed rank test to evaluate the success of the intervention.
Results: Six participants were women who frequently exhibited awkward postures, including bending, twisting, tilting, reaching with hands and arms, lifting over the shoulders, pulling, and bending their knees. The average REBA score for working postures was 11.63, indicating a high level of risk and the need for immediate corrective measures. Pain prevalence was highest in the lower back (100.0%), followed by the shoulders and upper back (87.5% each), and the neck (75.0%). After using the adjustable trolley, the risk assessment score for working postures decreased significantly to an average of 2.50. Pain levels in various body parts also showed a significant reduction, including the upper back (P-value = 0.027), lower back (P-value = 0.010), hands and wrists (P-value = 0.034), neck (p-value = 0.023), and shoulders (P-value = 0.016). Additionally, the trolley reduced the number of work steps from 16 to 9 (a 43.75% decrease) and shortened the work time per bag from 970 to 570 seconds (a 41.20% reduction).
Conclusion: The use of the adjustable trolley significantly reduced awkward postures and pain, thereby lowering the risk of musculoskeletal disorders and enhancing worker safety and efficiency.
References
Yindee W, Hasarin S. Blood donation and blood reserve management before and after the COVID-19 pandemic: experiences from Songklanagarind Hospital. Journal of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine. 2024;34:91-9.
Zare M, Black N, Sagot J-C, Hunault G, Roquelaure Y. Ergonomics interventions to reduce musculoskeletal risk factors in a truck manufacturing plant. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2020;75:102896.
Openshaw S, Taylor E. Ergonomics and design: a reference guide. Chicago: DIANE Publishing Company; 2006.
Maulik S, Iqbal R, De A, Chandra AM. Evaluation of the working posture and prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms among medical laboratory technicians. Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation. 2014;27(4):453-61.
Chow SC, Shao J, Wang H, Lokhnygina Y. Sample size calculations in clinical research. 3rd edition ed. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2017.
Thamkoson K. Improving working conditions using ergonomic principles in the bag conveying process from the quality inspection back to the cement bag making machine [Dissertation]: Kasetsart University; 2021.
Sokhibi A, Alifiana MA, editors. Ergonomic Trolley Design for Increasing Productivity in PG Jatibarang Brebes. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering Technology Universitas Muria Kudus; 2018 2018 Oct 25-26; Kudus, Indonesia.
Grandjean E, Kroemer KH. Fitting the task to the human: a textbook of occupational ergonomics. London: CRC Press; 1997.
Hignett S, McAtamney L. Rapid entire body assessment (REBA). Applied Ergonomics. 2000;31(2):201-5.
Descatha A, Roquelaure Y, Chastang JF, Evanoff B, Melchior M, Mariot C, et al. Validity of Nordic-style questionnaires in the surveillance of upper-limb work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health. 2007;33(1):58-65.
Green SM, Krauss BS. The Numeric Scoring of Pain: This Practice Rates a Zero Out of Ten. Annals of emergency medicine. 2016;67(5):573-5.
Shinde G. " Ergonomic analysis of an assembly workstation to identify time consuming and fatigue causing factors using application of motion study ". International Journal of Engineering and Technology. 2012;4:220-7.
Tummee S, Meepradit P, Yingratanasuk T. Application of motion economy for reducing musculoskeletal disorders risk factors among cable packers in an enterprise. Thai Journal of Ergonomics. 2024;7(1):72-82.
Rosner B, Glynn RJ, Lee ML. The Wilcoxon signed rank test for paired comparisons of clustered data. Biometrics. 2006;62(1):185-92.
Sungkhapong A, Pochana KM, Auesujaridwo W. Workstation improvement for risk reduction of muscular fatigue among production workers in tuna manufacturing process: a case study of a seafood processing factory. The Journal of KMUTNB. 2013;23(3):654-63.
Petchchu N. Work injury risk reduction utilizing ergonomics principles: A case study of Pijit Rubber Fund Cooperative Ltd [Dissertation]: Prince of Songkla University; 2012.
Imam A, Usman M, Chiawa M. On Consistency and Limitation of paired t-test, Sign and Wilcoxon Sign Rank Test. IOSR Journal of Mathematics. 2014;10:01-6.
Divine G, Norton HJ, Hunt R, Dienemann J. Statistical grand rounds: a review of analysis and sample size calculation considerations for Wilcoxon tests. Anesthesia and analgesia. 2013;117(3):699-710.
Chottanakit L. Efficiency Comparison of t-test and Wilcoxon signed rank test for two dependents populations [Dissertation]: Burapha University; 2011.
Boonlha K, Yodsaen N, Keawsrimuang S. Comparison of test statistics two dependent populations. Journal of Science Ladkrabang. 2018;27(1):78-87.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Public Health Asia Pacific
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
International Journal of Public Health Asia Pacific (IJPHAP) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, unless otherwise stated. Please read our Policies page for more information on Open Access, copyright, and permissions.
