Comparative analysis of healthcare responsiveness between insured and uninsured patients: A cross-sectional study in a tertiary hospital of Nepal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62992/tcpczv08Keywords:
Health system, Health insurance, ResponsivenessAbstract
Background: The responsiveness of a health system is considered to be an intrinsic goal of health systems and an essential aspect in performance assessment. This highlights the non-medical aspects of patients depend upon how health care facilities acknowledge patients’ demands.
Objectives: This study assesses perceptions of insured and uninsured patients regarding the responsiveness of inpatient services at a tertiary hospital in Nepal.
Methods: Using a cross-sectional, hospital-based design, quantitative research was conducted at the National Academy of Medical Sciences, Bir Hospital. A total of 228 participants were selected through simple random sampling. Data were collected via interviews. Associations between variables were identified through bivariate and multivariable logistic regression.
Results: The mean age of patients was 46.63 years with standard deviation (SD) of 16.33 years. Most patients perceived their health status as poor (93.9%), and 74.1% reported insufficient availability of medicines. Both insured and uninsured patient groups experienced poor responsiveness for three out of eight domains. Based on inpatient’s importance and experience, responsive domain can be classified into three priority groups to enhance responsiveness: 1st priority: Prompt attention and clarity of communication; 2nd priority: dignity, choice and quality of amenities; and 3rd priority: autonomy, confidentiality and social support.
Conclusion: The hospital should improve the degree of responsiveness in all domains, with priority given to prompt attention and clarity of communication. More attention should be given to patients who stay for longer durations in the hospital as Nepal expands national health insurance coverage.
References
Peltzer K, Phaswana-Mafuya N. Patient experiences and health system responsiveness among older adults in South Africa. Glob Health Action. 2012;5:1-11.
Mishra SR, Pratik K, Kumar KD, Per K, and Enemark U. National health insurance policy in Nepal: challenges for implementation. Global Health Action. 2015;8(1):28763.
Government of N, National Human Rights C. Assessment of Social Health Insurance Scheme in Selected Districts of Nepal. NHRC; 2018.
Chand B, Katuwal S, Pandit R, Pandey A. Satisfaction with Quality of Health Care among Teaching Hospitals in Kathmandu, Nepal. Asian Journal of Medicine and Health. 2018;10:1-11.
Organization for Economic C-o, Development. Responsiveness of health systems to patient needs. OECD; 2015.
Peltzer K. Patient experiences and health system responsiveness in South Africa. BMC Health Services Research. 2009;9(1):117.
World Health O. Health system Responsiveness. World Health Organization; 2005.
Mohammed S, Bermejo JL, Souares A, Sauerborn R, Dong H. Assessing responsiveness of health care services within a health insurance scheme in Nigeria: users’ perspectives. BMC Health Services Research. 2013;13(1):502.
World Health O. Improving health system efficiency as a means of moving towards universal coverage. World Health Organization; 2010.
Government of N. Constitution of Nepal. Government of Nepal; 2015.
Public Health U. Social Health Security (Health Insurance) Program in Nepal Kathmandu, Nepal: Public Health Update; 2018 [updated 2018/05/13. Available from: https://publichealthupdate.com/social-health-security-health-insurance-program-in-nepal/#google_vignette.
Geldsetzer P, Haakenstad A, James EK, Atun R. Non-technical health care quality and health system responsiveness in middle-income countries: a cross-sectional study in China, Ghana, India, Mexico, Russia, and South Africa. J Glob Health. 2018;8(2):020417.
Garba MR, Gadanya MA, Iliyasu Z, Gajida AU. Comparative Study of Patients' Satisfaction between National Health Insurance Scheme-Insured and Un-Insured Patients Attending a Northern Nigerian Tertiary Hospital. Nigerian Journal of Basic and Clinical Sciences. 2018;15(2).
Robone S, Rice N, Smith PC. Health systems' responsiveness and its characteristics: a cross-country comparative analysis. Health Serv Res. 2011;46(6pt2):2079-100.
Mishra SR, Khanal P, Karki DK, Kallestrup P, Enemark U. National health insurance policy in Nepal: challenges for implementation. Glob Health Action. 2015;8:28763.
Otis KE, Brett JA. Barriers to hospital births: why do many Bolivian women give birth at home? Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2008;24(1):46-53.
Rashidian A, Kavosi Z, Majdzadeh R, Pourreza A, Pourmalek F, Arab M, Mohammad K. Assessing health system responsiveness: a household survey in 17th district of tehran. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2011;13(5):302-8.
Atun R, Jaffar S, Nishtar S, Knaul FM, Barreto ML, Nyirenda M, et al. Improving responsiveness of health systems to non-communicable diseases. Lancet. 2013;381(9867):690-7.
Bazzaz MM, Taghvaee MR, Salehi M, Bakhtiari M, Shaye ZA. Health System's Responsiveness of Inpatients: Hospitals of Iran. Glob J Health Sci. 2015;7(7 Spec No):106-13.
Liabsuetrakul T, Petmanee P, Sanguanchua S, Oumudee N. Health system responsiveness for delivery care in Southern Thailand. Int J Qual Health Care. 2012;24(2):169-75.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
International Journal of Public Health Asia Pacific (IJPHAP) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, unless otherwise stated. Please read our Policies page for more information on Open Access, copyright, and permissions.
